Skip to content

Do You Know the Way to San Jose? Only the State Department Knows or Cares

January 5, 2010

The State Department’s Craig Kelly is in Honduras pursuing the San Jose Accords.  Here are some random thoughts I have about this:

 I’m trying to figure out which is the most annoying:  waiting around for Francisco Franco to die or waiting for the State Dept. to shut up about the San Jose Accords. 

I guess it’s time to ask, “What can Hondurans expect from a “truth” commission under the Lobo “administration” that they didn’t already get from an “election” under Micheletti?”

The State Department’s relentless pursuit of the Accords can only mean one thing:  it holds the key to the US ‘ total and complete colonization of Honduras.


State Department Transcript Excerpt on Honduras, January 5, 2010, PJ Crowley, Spokesman

From Crowley’s Introductory Remarks:

And finally, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Craig Kelly for Western Hemisphere Affairs is in Honduras today. He’ll be there today and tomorrow meeting with leaders from various sectors, including President-elect Lobo, continuing our efforts to move the process forward, the Tegucigalpa-San Jose process forward as we approach the inauguration of the new president on January 27th. And we continue to work with those parties on the expeditious formation of a national unity government and the establishment of a truth commission.

From the Q and A session where reporters are required to suspend reality:

QUESTION: Well, I just want one on Honduras. I mean, isn’t it a little besides the point now? I mean, you’re going to kind of implement the San Jose process. You already have a president-elect. You have an inauguration coming up. You’ve already pretty much said that you’re going to accept and deal with the new government. So what is this kind of symbolic box-checking of making sure that you implement the San Jose Accords before the new government —

MR. CROWLEY: Well, I don’t think it’s symbolic at all. I mean, obviously, what happened back in June represents a breach in the heart of Honduran society, and to some extent that tension is still there. So yes, you’re right; there is a new government that will be installed on January 27th. The real question is: Can that government be a vehicle through which you begin a healing process and you have a situation where the Honduran people can unite behind this new government? That is our primary effort here: How do we help Honduras move forward and to overcome the clear tension that resulted in the actions taken last June?

QUESTION: Well, but the tension was from Zelaya’s rule and the people that wanted him back in versus the people that –


QUESTION: Whatever.

MR. CROWLEY: That’s true. By the same token, our interest here is in seeing a true restoration of constitutional and democratic rule, and to see Honduras advance as a stable and contributing member of the international community.

QUESTION: But – I understand that, but if you undo what you —

MR. CROWLEY: And, oh, by the way, we do have some decisions to make in the future about the future nature of our relationship. As we said back in November, the election was a step forward. We felt that the results did reflect the will of the Honduran people. That said, the election by itself was not enough to – we have some decisions to make in terms of the nature of our relationship, the nature of assistance in the future.

So there are still steps that Honduras has to take, and we are encouraged by comments by President-elect Lobo, but we are there to continue to move this process forward not only to get to January 27, but most importantly, to see that government advance once it’s in office.

QUESTION: Well – I’m sorry.

QUESTION: Is that —

MR. CROWLEY: Is that —

QUESTION: Well, I’m sorry. No. I have a couple more questions on this.


QUESTION: How – I mean, I understand about moving forward, but how by undoing what you did – not what you did, but what was done in Honduras at the absolute last minute right before the inauguration of this new president that you – by this new president repairs the constitutional breach that took place? And why would you need to reevaluate what kind of relationship you need with Honduras going forward? This was all about the interim government and the former deposed government. And why would you punish this new government for what happened before that?

MR. CROWLEY: Well, remember, not only do we support a government of national unity that reflects all of the components —

QUESTION: For a day or a couple of days?



MR. CROWLEY: Well, no – we support the formation of a national unity government that represents broad interests in Honduras. But most importantly, you need to have this truth commission that is part of a healing process that has to occur if Honduras is going to advance. So it is – there are a number of steps in the Tegucigalpa-San Jose Accords. Some of them have been implemented, but not all, and this continues to demonstrate our commitment to the people of Honduras and to the future relationship between the United States and Honduras. But there are definitely – Craig is there to communicate clearly to a variety of parties that there are still things that Honduras has to do.

  1. January 6, 2010 12:57 AM

    The byplay was interesting. The reporters said “Sorry” at least three times, and one responded to the Colonel once with “Whatever.”

    It doesn’t sound as if the press is taking Crowley seriously anymore.

    • January 6, 2010 10:09 AM

      Actually, you could transfer this dynamic to the theatre stage and produce a pretty good little foreign policy farce.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: